I've had this idea on my my mind for a while now, its just I have had other things to write about on the forums, plus, I'm worried by now people are annoyed with my posting :lol: JOKES, I don't care if your annoyed, I raise valid questions and points, so suck it up, its all for the betterment of the server that I have sort of fell in love with 
If two users make an agreement to do or not do something and write out the terms and conditions using a book and quill, would this be enforceable?
For example:
James wants someone to rent his old house for money.
Kelly wants a place to live.
James wants money, however Kelly has no money.
They both come to a compromise, where Instead of Kelly giving James money weekly, Kelly harvests the farms on the land at least once a week, replants and gives half of the product to James. In return James lets Kelly have full access to the 20x15 land claim as long as she doesn't destroy the main structure of the house and farms.
So they both write the same identical Agreements in a book and quill each, and sign one book each.
In that, then Kelly gives here signed book to James and James gives his book to Kelly, so that in the event of someone breaking the agreement, the other can take their book with the signature for the someone who broke the deal.
Other things that can be included in the Books and quill contracts could be the consequences for breaking an agreement, such as having to pay an amount of money or give an amount of item(s) etc. Perhaps even Mod intervention/support?
The real question here is: To what extent would moderators support this idea?
As it would seem that people are wanting to do things on this server, but cannot trust people due to griefing, however if they had the tool of contracting with the other party stating that if they go against their word that they consent to a ban for 1 month (as an example), would the Mods do the ban if the book and quill is presented?
Chipsz
If two users make an agreement to do or not do something and write out the terms and conditions using a book and quill, would this be enforceable?
For example:
James wants someone to rent his old house for money.
Kelly wants a place to live.
James wants money, however Kelly has no money.
They both come to a compromise, where Instead of Kelly giving James money weekly, Kelly harvests the farms on the land at least once a week, replants and gives half of the product to James. In return James lets Kelly have full access to the 20x15 land claim as long as she doesn't destroy the main structure of the house and farms.
So they both write the same identical Agreements in a book and quill each, and sign one book each.
In that, then Kelly gives here signed book to James and James gives his book to Kelly, so that in the event of someone breaking the agreement, the other can take their book with the signature for the someone who broke the deal.
Other things that can be included in the Books and quill contracts could be the consequences for breaking an agreement, such as having to pay an amount of money or give an amount of item(s) etc. Perhaps even Mod intervention/support?
The real question here is: To what extent would moderators support this idea?
As it would seem that people are wanting to do things on this server, but cannot trust people due to griefing, however if they had the tool of contracting with the other party stating that if they go against their word that they consent to a ban for 1 month (as an example), would the Mods do the ban if the book and quill is presented?
Chipsz
